|
Many so-called experts have suggested that hydrogen is the long-term answer to the question of our future fuel choice for motor vehicles. Burning it releases no CO2, and it may be (renewably) made from water using electricity. The hydrogen invented may then either be burnt in a traditionalisti engine, or applied in a fuel cell to directly invent electricity. As a direct result of this level of interest, a heap of people and companies have started out to market gimmicks and conceptions for using hydrogen to run their each day vehicles. There are two main systems, with rather dissimilar technical variations. The first, and most straightforward concept, is to plainly substitute hydrogen for petrol or diesel. Hydrogen is made by electrolysis, either on-board from the alternator electrical supply or at home using mains electricity, and then burnt in the engine. The energy freed drives the vehicle in the ordinary way. In principle this scheme does of course work. The problem is that the whole routine is very inefficient, and the energy you get from burning the hydrogen alone can not perchance be sufficient to supply the energy required to make the hydrogen in the initial place. With an on-board system, the engine is only with regards to 40% effective at best, and the alternator perchance 90%, so even if you assume the electrolysis is 100% effective you only get back with regards to a third of the energy you put in. There is likewise a substantial amount of weight added to the vehicle with this system. Another system uses the hydrogen as a supplement to the petrol or deisel (as a combustion enhancer). The conception of this scheme is that adding rather little amounts of hydrogen to the fuel/air mixture cause improvements to the burn, which in turn leads to better economy and scaled down emissions. This system plainly weighs a fraction of the on-board system. Many gimmicks that develop hydrogen thru on-board electrolysis feed not pure hydrogen, but a mixture of hydrogen and oxygen, to the engine. This mixture (two parts hydrogen to one percentage oxygen) is normally known as Brown’s Gas. Several reputable studies have been done into the concept, and there is no doubt that adding hydrogen to a petrol / air mix in the rectify symmetry gives the following benefits:
These substantial improvements in power and economy may in truth be verified – Arvin Meritor assert up to 20-130%. So, this is a outstanding technology and we will have to all rush out and bolt hydrogen generators onto our cars? I didn’t say that….If the system fits your car and you have an interest in doing your share for the environment, then you may gain financially from fitting this system to your car. The lower fuel costs alone are worth the crusade but you will actually clean the inside of your engine and prolong the life of engine and catalytic convertor by the addition of hydrogen to the burn process. Add to this the gain to your local surroundings and it seems like a no-brainer….but the choice is still in your hands. A note on alternators: a view often times indicated regarding on-board hydrogen generation is that there is not sufficient “free” electricity available for that purpose. In reality, the alternator is much smarter than that. If the vehicle electrical scheme only has a little demand, and the battery is completely charged, then the alternator will regulate itself to invent less electricity. In reality, a typical innovative car alternator may fabricate 80A at greatest or most complete or best possible output (around 1kW), in order to meet peak demands, but since the electricity demand in normal conditions is much less (say 20A), the “excess” is freely available for intents such as hydrogen generation without any further and added loading on the engine. Respectfully, Colin Brennan |
1Kw Fuel Cell
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.




